Critical Assignment Case Study 4 CSO 2.4
YOU MUST APPLY the theories and ideas you have read from the Lussier book. (Book Attached).
Read the case “You Are Not Hurt? Good, Youre Fired!” ( Lussier Case 14.2 p.538 ). Submission for this case should be in essay form and adhere to full APA requirements. Use headings to identify each of the assignment requirements. Include reference to the facts from the case and citations from the book:
Case Study 4 Questions
1. This case was a civil case. How might it have become a federal case under OSHAs charge?
2. How might ActioNet have not upheld their OSHA responsibilities?
3. Although a federal investigation 2 days later indicated no wrongdoing on Yangs part (he was called a complete victim), ActioNet took no further action in the matter. If these were OSHA investigators, under what category of violation might ActioNet be subject to penalty?
4. Stress might have been the cause of Tymonys intolerable conduct. Which cause(s) of stress might have accounted for his inexcusable behavior?
5. What are the causes of workplace violence, and how might they help us better understand this case?
6. What are the signs of potential violence, and were any exhibited in this case?
7. What trends or issues in workplace safety apply to this case?
8. What Christian principles are in question in the case? How do your personal values and beliefs inform your examination of the case?
Critical Assignment Rubric
Fully developed examination of the factors of the case that would constitute it to be a federal case under OSHAs charge. Corresponding OSHA factors are explicitly identified and thoroughly examined.
Fully developed and insightful examination of how ActioNet did not uphold their OSHA responsibilities. Analysis is thoroughly and consistently supported with OSHA references.
Fully developed examination and explicit identification of the OSHA category(s) of violation that AcioNet would be subject to penalty under OSHA for not taking further action.
Fully developed examination of cause(s) of stress that might have accounted for the inexcusable behavior in the case.
Fully developed and insightful examination of what are the causes of workplace violence, and how might they help us better understand this case.
Fully developed and explicit identification of the signs of potential violence, and insightful examination if any were exhibited in this case.
Fully developed and explicit identification of trends and issues in workplace safety that applies to this case.
Fully developed evaluation and identification of what Christian principles are in question in this case. Insightful introspective evaluation of how personal values and beliefs inform your examination of the case.
