Who had a better understanding of the relationship between personal motivation and the achievement of social order: Smith or Plato?

Papers must be typed and double-spaced. Use a 12-point font and one-inch margins. When quoting or paraphrasing the text, please cite the page number you are quoting or paraphrasing.

Question:
Who had a better understanding of the relationship between personal motivation and the achievement of social order: Smith or Plato?

* There is no need for footnotes or endnotes in this paper. Merely cite,at the end of the sentence, both the title of the book (in italics) and the page from which you are quoting or paraphrasing, like so: (Republic, 143) or (Wealth of Nations, 356). If you are citing two sources in one sentence, you should cite them like so: (Republic, 143; Wealth of Nations, 356). There is no need for secondary sources.

The main concern is an argument that MUST be defined in the first paragraph. This professor is very critical about that, he never gives an “A” grade and the last paper that I’ve ordered by a professional writer was graded as “C-” because of the problem with an argument.

The books we are using for this paper are
“Plato Republic” translated by G.M.A. Grube revised by C.D.C. Reeve (Hackett Publishing Company, INC Indianapolis/Cambridge)

“An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” by Adam Smith (both vol 1 and 2) edited by R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner/ The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith