summary/reflective essay

focus on the Sabine Kriebel reading(focus on section 4, pp. 38-43) and compose an essay (see the format guidelines at the bottom of the page) that addresses the following questions:

What are some of the putative differences between analogue and digital photography, according to Kriebel? How do these differences change the way one might theorize photography?
How does Mitchell theorize the differences between analogue and digital photography? How does this change its evidentiary value? Is this convincing?
How does Manovich critique Mitchells argument? Are his criticisms convincing to you? If Manovich is convincing, that how is digital photography different than analogue? Are we “post-photography”?
don’t use outside sources please use the full name when you mention in the essay