Factors Associated with Substance Use Disorder Treatment Completion VERSES Substance use disorders and risk for treatment resistant depression
write a literature review using your research question as an organizing framework. This literature review will discuss what is known in the contemporary peer-reviewed literature about how and if the independent variables in question have an effect on the dependent variable. You will identify gaps in the peer-reviewed social welfare literature. These gaps include, but are not limited to, instances where the independent variables have not been assessed in your target population (race, ethnicity, age groups, sociodemographic status, etc), that the independent variable has not been assessed with regard to the dependent variable you have selected, or, perhaps the gap is with respect to the methodology of the previous studies (limited to one geographic area, small sample sizes, etc). Displaying your depth of knowledge on a topic or issue through writing,
Comparing, analyzing, and evaluating the scholarly writing of others,
Understanding of scholarly writing, debates, and competing arguments,
Beginning awareness of different research methodologies,
Ability to construct your own argument while citing the published work previously conducted in your field,
Taking responsibility for the direction of your learning by pursuing a topic area that is interesting to you.
The final product will consist of: A cover sheet in APA format
A second page that includes your revised research question and hypothesis. Be clear about what your independent variables, and the dependent variable are. Please use subheadings on this page.
A 5-page literature review
References (no limit on the number, but most include at least 10-15 different scholarly references)
Npte: The cover sheet, second page, and reference pages are not included in the 5-page literature review page count. Please use the following naming convention when submitting your paper LastNameFirstName
Your paper should be structured as follows:
Introduction:Identification of the problem, study objectives, research question(s) and/or hypothesis (es).
This section is typically be 3-5 pagraphs and should contain at least3 unique citations. Here you should define key concepts and provide critical background information to frame the problem (e.g. magnitude of problem, who and how it affects general and specific populations, key characteristics of populations, ect.). In this section your should address:
Clearly state your research questions/hypotheses (What is your research trying to find out?)
Why is this important research, what is its significance, and why should someone reading the proposal care about the outcomes of the proposed study?
Answer the “So What? question [i.e., why should anyone care].
Present the rationale of your research question and base that rationale in available evidence. Identify gaps that your research will address.
Note how your proposed study builds on previous assumptions about the research problem.
Body:In the body of this paper, you will provide an assessment of your two interventions (independent variables in your hypothesis). You will accomplish this by selecting and critically examing one peer reviewd article for each intervention. This article must report the effects of the chosen intervention. (~3 pargraphs for each intervention article). Examples:
CBT as a tx for depression (reported in article 1) versus MBSR as a treatment for depression (reported in article 2).
Group therapy as tx for anxiety disorders among youth (reported in article 1) versus individualized therapy as tx for anxiety disorders among youth.
This section must be well-written and logically organized. Be specific about the methodological approaches each study chose, the strength of their data sources, and the trustworthiness or their results. For each article: describe the study design, including a description of participants and sampling methods, data collection procedures, measures, and analytic/ statistical approach.
Conclusions:In this section, you will summarize the findings of your review and draw conclusions. Compare and contrast the strengths and weakness of the the articles under review. Make conclusions about limitations and relevant areas for future inquiry. This is where you demonstrate your critical reflection of the content and tie in key concepts from the course into your appraisal. Dig deeper by asking questions such as:
What were the key results and what conclusions did the authors draw?
Are these conclusions justified by the methods?
Were the research approaches comprehensive or did it leave you with questions?
Was there a better methodology that could have been undertaken to address the original research question proposed in the article(s)?
Were there flaws in the measures used?
Were there flaws in the research process or author conclusions?
Were ethical issues present?
Are results generalizable? To what extent?
What are the limitations and implications for future research and/ or social work practice? Include those that are reported in the article as well as those you suggest based on your critical review.
What are the next steps to continue to move the research understanding forward on this topic?